Four at Four: Goldman Analysts, Not Earnings, Move the Market




It speaks poorly of both the press and the analysts for their gooey praise of Goldman Sachs. Be sure, it is factually wrong.
GS’stock has outperformed the index of investment banks for two simple reasons. One is that it dramatically underperformed Wall Street during the 1990s, especially to Lehman Brothers. There is give back by the other firms.
Second, it is silly to pick dates which show GS has not suffered. Its stock’s high was 245 and is now hovering at 170. That means NEARLY ONE THIRD OF GOLDMAN’S STOCK VALUATION HAS BEEN WIPED OUT.
Third, the reason Goldman has flattened out is because it took HUGE HITS ON ITS SUBPRIME EXPOSURE IN JULY 2007. Having lost one third of its value is not good, especially since brokers and commercial bankers are expected to put client capital to work and provide a return on their Money Market accounts. GS had no reason to enter the business in the first place.
WSJ has pumped stories for GS showing it avoided that exposure but it did not. The hedges which were taken were wildly overstated in Nik Deogun’s article and said to be so by Goldman’s spokesman.
Moreover the superstars who did those hedges were all pushed out by the big wigs and Lloyd Blankfein and Jon Winkelried and Ed Forst who paid themselves $170 million between themselves for avoiding the subprime mess!!!
Let me repeat, Goldman lost one third of its value in 2007 because of a $4 billion hit on the subprime business which it alone had no business to be involved in, and it mitigated those risks with hedges put in place by people, all three of which are out of the firm, and the ones who stopped them from taking bigger shorts on subprime paid themselves $170 million.
Goldman underperformed in the 2000s, not the 1990s, when it was not public.
If all these wet behind the ears analyst would go out and get a real job instead of scaring the socks off the investors to help their friends take a short position, the market would be better off.
If gold is going to go over $1000, then I will hold onto my precious metals mutual fund.
If gold trades above $1,100, where should oil, USD and 10-year treasury trade? Will Bernake still be the Feds chairman?
If gold trades over $1,100, where should oil, USD and 5-year treasury trade? Will Bernake still be the Feds chairman?
The UK’s second largest bank RBS has today warned clients of a stock and credit crash. Time to stock up on gold? This is Goldman’s swansong, see: http://arabianmoney.net/2008/06/18/gold-and-silver-prices-to-rocket-as-inflation-grows-this-summer/
Maybe it would help RF’s capital woes if our CEO & Chairman didn’t consistently take out $17MM - $20MM bonuses @ every FYE!
Here is a link to RF article
http://financial-alchemist.blogspot.com/2008/06/regions-financial-rf-due-for-bounce.html
MarketBeat, led by Wall Street Journal Online writer David Gaffen, looks under the hood of Wall Street each day, finding market-moving news and analyzing interesting trends and numbers. The blog is updated several times daily with contributions from reporters at The Wall Street Journal and the Online Journal and includes noteworthy commentary from the best blogs and research notes. Have a comment? Write to