Uma Fan: Stalker or ‘Misfit With Strange Sense of Humor?’
Update: On Tuesday morning, a Manhattan jury convicted Jordan. He faces up to a year in jail. Click here for the AP account.
To what extent does celebrity affect a district attorney’s decision to prosecute, say, an alleged stalker? Yesterday, when George Vomvolakis, the lawyer for Jack Jordan, who is accused of stalking actress Uma Thurman, gave his closing arguments in New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan he argued that because Thurman “is larger than life,” the DA’s office “went the extra mile.” He said that if a less famous woman had been involved, she might might have merely kicked Jordan “to the curb,” but he wouldn’t have faced criminal charges. Click here for Anemona Hartocollis’s wrap-up piece in the NYT, and here for past LB coverage of the trial.
In closing arguments yesterday, reports Hartocollis, the defense tried to paint Jordan, 37, as a social misfit with a strange sense of humor, while the prosecution attempted to brand him a dangerous, manipulative liar, who should’ve known that he was putting Thurman, 38, in fear for her life. Jordan, a University of Chicago grad who, reports the NY Post, has been sleeping on Manhattan sidewalks during the trial, stands accused of following and sending threatening cards and e-mail messages to Thurman on and off for about two and a half years.
Vomvolakis, Jordan’s lawyer, reportedly told the jury, “Think about your lives and what you have done in your lives in the name of love,” he urged. “Think about the stupid things you have done.”
Jessica Taub, the lead prosecutor, said Jordan had hounded and frightened Thurman, which is part of the legal definition of stalking. “He wanted to be with Uma Thurman and he would not take no for an answer,” Taub said. “I mean, really, the manipulation here, you have to see it.”
Let me be the FIRST to say that her career has not kept up with the expectations people had for her back in the late 1980s.
Are you kidding me?
Put the guy in jail. He is a psycho.
He may be a psycho; but that’s not a jailable offense, in and of itself.
From what I’ve read the guy is crazy and infatuated. But “frightening” is a subjective term (probably unconstirutionally vague). Would a reasonable person with normal sensibilities be fearful of danger as a result of non-threatening notes from a rubuked admirer? No. It may be weird that he persisted, but scary? What did he do that would cause a reasonable person (not most celebrities) to fear danger. It’s possible to be rebuked, persist, and not be violent.
KS Trial Lawyer=stalker
KS Trial Lawyer:
Tyes, the guy is “crazy and infatuated”–that is why he was charged with stalking, and not something more serious. The reason that stalking is on the books is to prevent cukoo birds like this guy from taking it to the next level
if he was a wvu grad, would it be mentioned in every write-up?
Jordan’s lawyer was very close to breaking the golden rule, and in my opinion, he did. If the verdict comes back for the Defendant, there should be an immedeate mistrial declared.
KS,
He is intentionally stalking her. What else does one need to do get it stopped.
What do we wait for, stabbing, shooting???
So don’t put him in jail, sanitorium is fine by me, and chop his balls off.
Anonymous @ 11:50, that’s rich … coming from an anonymous poster!
Igor @ 12:54, How about a restraining order … before a criminal conviction?
KS Trial Lawyer - you’re a fool. And using the name “KS Trial Lawyer” still makes you an anonymous poster.
In New York City, absent family court issues, you can’t get a temporary order of protection (not called a “restraining order”) until an arrest is made and the defendant is arraigned.
Georgie boy (the defendant’s attorney) was an ADA in Manhattan for a few years (he left a couple years ago) and was pompous and not well liked.